In its Draft BudgetbegleitG Justice 2011 - 2013, the Justice Minister does - in drastic cuts in customer service through the courts - despite protestations to the contrary.
"The proposed schemes for improving all people access to justice, "comes in the introduction yet full-bodied in the Remarks to draft . Looking at the actual impact on the legal subject is then but one or two doubts about that statement. It would be so different around the Squaring the circle also suspiciously close to when an economy package stakeholders only could bring benefits.
In FortpflanzungsmedizinG such as the mandatory for communities advice including approval confirmation hinkünftig only offered by a notary. If it was previously possible, relate the same power to an alternative to the District Court, that was not only a more tenders It was also just the most cost-effective for those affected variant abolished - which is now to give them better access to justice alleged ...
Even in civil litigation in a variety of schemes that should be red pen set, which now give a verbal command, the court found by logging into the input files. For example, to the exception for oral recourse to § 520 Abs account for 1 set of 2 CCP, and thus apply also to such appeals lawyer obligation to which such representation was necessary or not in the first instance - which improves access to justice for all persons determined. ..
Raising the threshold of criminality for property crimes is not provided - no reason for concern then? However, if required for criminal liability for negligent injury duration of damage to health is to be increased from three to 14 days, then one might be better in the on 13 Days stuck again abgeschwollenen skin of the victim. The injured person has in fact this case is no longer the legal certainty of a criminal conviction of the offender in view. In a civil proceedings for damages claims thus contributes hinkünftig the injured not by default experts use considerable financial risk. That such violations are now to remain unpunished, is on a separate page - at least but now the victim get a much better access to justice ...
Improved access of legal interns to their legal knowledge was mentioned only in passing. Was it to process over the previous nine months of the so-called "judicial year" still possible to at least three different courts, at least one case or another for a while, the proposed reduction leaves on five months now expect only two scenarios: either the entire permanently at a court to follow the general trend of specialization, or how far to get to know several types of courts, and if but the learning effect would be reduced to the pursuit of individual negotiations (which - as seen - also to participate in five days would be), because due to the next Diet for at least two changeovers. This improved access to justice - from a completely different perspective - will probably raise the quality of education does not necessarily ...
A number of significant fee increases, particularly land and company registration completes the beneficial effects of this draft thoroughly. But the part 10% increase in the two public books will make up almost two thirds of the whole contribution from the Justice Department to the austerity package the federal government. As in some sectors also seems to apply here: The more expensive, the better the access to justice for all people ...
Where benefits are removed, is naturally the saved expense in a rule on the previous beneficiary of it passed on. It does not take an expert to recognize this law. The need for a reorganization of the public budget is understandable for most citizens. Why then sprinkle with the above-quoted remark long sand in the eye? An honest and transparent well-presented proposal would meet with much more acceptable!
th 101115_01
0 comments:
Post a Comment