So, today we do a workshop on "Writing Made Easy" along the lines of the two chefs WeWo Engeler and property. The recipe:
Take ...
... a dogmatic attitude (all that comes from the State is bad)
... a hare-brained idea (home schooling is much better)
... a conservative world view (mom and grandma are in the house and to take care of the children)
... some hair-raising absurd theories (for example, state funding of child care centers and day schools is the same as the promotion of young Nationalsozialsmus)
... a single case that will carry the entire building (two poor teachers that their children have educational needs despite home advantage into school)
... and backed the whole thing with arbitrary numbers sought on the issue (number of children per woman and Canton / Country, without the comparison with the proportion of women in gebährfähgien age, is the low proportion of children in Ticino to explain, possibly with an aging?)
... which will now prove the above-mixed (there are already enough working women and mothers in Switzerland, in which case we do indeed get it right)
So much for the dream world of the writer. So what is the reality?
- In Switzerland there are still virtually no day schools and day-care programs. Apart from working parents who would need it, it would also be spoiled for the more able children a valuable experience to spend time with other children, instead of at noon home to nuts run. At what age are we living that still prevails in fact a system where the mothers are at home all day and have to cook lunch for their children.
- Kinderkrippenpläzte are extremely rare and expensive. It actually holds a lot of young, working women from having children (I myself know many such actions).
- in Switzerland's prosperity depends, among other things, very strongly connected with the high participation rate of women. If, in the wake suddenly no one wants children, then you should not place the infrastructure to provide? Apart assume that the entire child care sector could become a new profitable industry.
- The only question is who should pay for child care and who is organized. Sure it's nice when people can arrange private, then they should do the same. Since the WeWo has even right, the over-regulation is completely out of place. It should be easier for individuals to set up crèches.
- Also on the child allowances for Giesskannenprinzip one can argue. However, should not be having children at risk of poverty and not eat up a children's nursery place half the income. That since the government intervenes in support has nothing to do with paternalism, but reasonable with a welfare state. Why should we compare how much the government can spend and how much for a cow for a child, then we again discuss the rational distribution of state funds.
- If children do not go to school and have the feeling that they were trusted with the family to mature just as well that takes into account that spoiled, unrealistic children grow up by wealthy families, who are talking with people from other races, not even can. (This leads perhaps to the fact that they write such articles.)
Auso, Fipu and Ürsu, now take out your finger. How many children do you have anyway? And the woman is chained to the stove?
0 comments:
Post a Comment